I don’t how many people even remember the olden days of web development. I’m talking about the time when under construction GIFs were accepted, even if a site had been “under construction” for over a year. It was during this era that what has been known as the “browser wars.” We pretty much all took a side, and our pages advertised quite obviously what side we chose. These ubiquitous banners saying “This Site Designed For…” inhabit some dark and painful corner of our minds. When the wars were over, it stopped mattering if you were a Netscape supporter or a Microsoft supporter. You survived and that was all that mattered.

People talk about the war; they say that Firefox started it up again. I don’t think I believe that. Microsoft and Netscape worked very hard at pushing the differences. These days, all of the major players (even Microsoft) work towards a standard. This makes all of our lives easier. I wake up and realize that one day in the future I won’t have to worry about whether or not my design works in both browsers.

Don’t misunderstand; it already has gotten much better, and we are continuing on that path, even if our progress isn’t always in the direction I would hope. But then I see something like this(theregister.co.uk), and I lose much of that faith. For even a small manufacturer to say that the standards are “too hard” or able to be compromised is a statement of arrogance. For it to come out of one of the major players is unforgivable. As a developer and designer, I want to know that by working with one set of rules I can reach the most people. As I have a number of Mac users in this audience (a member am I), as well as an important minority at my full time gig, I can assure you that any solution for me will address them. That solution has historically been the standards.

Reading this article, I find myself imagining a new series of website badges proliferating. It is this vision that shows that, despite all talk towards progress, we still feel the need to homogenize. Microsoft has made some unique strides as of late, and the corporate dialog is one of working together. They have sat on a broken html renderer for the better part of a decade. If Trident cannot be expected to handle web content correctly, it is past time to replace it. And if there are sites that get broken by this fact, it is time they were made to uphold the standards we have all agreed upon years ago.

Bandying around the term “backwards compatibility” is a disingenuous way to say that you are above the standards the community has set.

You are not.

Near the tail end of last year, I replaced my Powerbook for some nice Apple Intel goodness. For the most part, I have loved my new MacBook, although it did require some changes in workflow. This is due to the fact that, at least for me, Microsoft Office runs horribly on Rosetta. It runs worse than my old Photoshop 7.

I switched my one email account (this one) that I used on Entourage over to Mail.app. That was the big change. I don’t use Word or Excel that much, and Keynote puts PowerPoint to utter shame. After that, I spent very little time thinking about it.

Today, I was forced to recall the pain. I needed to write a quick business letter and fired up Word. I guess it was the instance of Photoshop CS3 (wonderful, I should add), but it took literally a minute and a half for the project dialog to come up and be changeable. Everything just sort of hung there afterwards.

Ultimately, the whole ordeal took about an extra ten minutes because of Rosetta, and this was for a ten minute letter. I can only imagine what people who have to use Word for extended periods of time think about this joy. Personally, I’m glad I have nice Universal apps that cover my general writing needs.

While I can accept that it can take a bit of time to update an application for a whole new architecture, I am reminded of why most magazines (that are Mac houses) switched over to InDesign. Adobe took a bit of time in converting their apps over to Mac OS X, but Quark took a much longer time. This meant that any creative who needed a layout program and wanted a new computer had to either run Quark in a hobbled environment or use Adobe’s flashy InDesign. If you take a look at the field now, you can see what most shops with a decent budget chose.

Maybe it’s time for someone to really challenge Office on the Mac…

Emily Nussbaum has an interesting article in New York Magazine (Link) in which she discusses the extreme generation gap specifically with regards to how people raised with technology and computer networks view privacy.

One part that I thoroughly enjoyed was a quote from Clay Shirky (a brilliant man who seems to have given up on his website - http://www.shirky.com):

Shirky describes this generational shift in terms of pidgin versus Creole. “Do you know that distinction? Pidgin is what gets spoken when people patch things together from different languages, so it serves well enough to communicate. But Creole is what the children speak, the children of pidgin speakers. They impose rules and structure, which makes the Creole language completely coherent and expressive, on par with any language. What we are witnessing is the Creolization of media.”

That’s a cool metaphor, I respond. “I actually don’t think it’s a metaphor,” he says. “I think there may actually be real neurological changes involved.”

If I am very honest with myself, I cannot place myself in either camp. I spend too much time online and treat in much the same way my younger cousins do, but ultimately there is always a discomfort that perhaps I’ve said too much…

It is amazing to me how much things have changed and how different my experience with the internet is compared to both my father and one of my younger cousins. In many ways, I live the internet: I work as a web developer, I have two different blogs, I’ve been instant messaging for almost a decade. My father also works in the internet, but his experience is much more unnatural, kind of. He makes purchases, researches various conundrums, and communicates via email and IM. My cousin has a livejournal, a myspace, a facebook. To her, the internet is a place to treat as if it was another physical location.

I find the different levels interesting. Dad’s usage makes it a knowledge platform first and foremost. When it comes to communication, he treats in a one to one or one to few manner. The internet for him is a text-based cellphone and light-weight encyclopedia.

My cousin uses it like it is the physical world. She didn’t seem uncomfortable when I mentioned finding her livejournal and was amused by my attempts to make her feel so. It wasn’t that she had anything really bad on it; I just view a mixing of my offline world and inline world (especially when family is involved) as ultimately a situation to avoid. To her, it is a natural thing, because they are the same thing. I would bet that she doesn’t make a distinction between an online discussion and a discussion in the “real world.”

My usage is similar to hers except that I spend a lot of time thinking about what I want to share and what should remain to myself. A few times on other online forums, the two worlds have collided. The result was usually painless externally, but it would take a good deal of time to let the discomfort fade before I felt free enough to post what I actually wanted to stay.

In many ways, I suspect that my cousin’s attitude might actually be better than mine. I generally don’t shy away from controversial subjects, and the only result of my online discussions have been positive. I’ve met (online) people that I never would have gotten to know otherwise. I’ve gotten job offers because of material I’ve written. Even the noise that can come with playing in such a public forum has constructive value. Aside from a few uncomfortable discussions with my parents, who just don’t understand why I do what I do, I have never suffered from what I love to do.

In the end, the world has and is changing. It will change us, but not as much as we think. I’d imagine that I will pretty much stay the same way I am: a participant in internet culture, but always feeling like I’m missing part of the message. My cousin will probably always be a willing participant that doesn’t understand why people like me “hold back.” And, i doubt I will ever see my father blogging; I’m sure he doesn’t see the value in it.

My first online forum experience was in high school and it was before I heard about this thing called the internet (I dialed into a BBS). It was probably too little too late for me to ever be entirely comfortable with the wide world of the world wide web. I am glad that I have the comfort I do, for I cannot imagine not having this wonderful forum to share my ideals.

The article did a good job of not judging the practice; it was almost anthropological in a sense. In honor of that, I think it must be mentioned explicitly: I don’t think the generation gap referred in the article is one of shifting values, although that is always happening, but one of how our relationship with technology is shaped by our exposure. As in most cases, the change is not good or bad; it is change, pure and simple. And it is inevitable.